See A Doctor If....

Do not diagnose yourself.

Hey folks,

We talk a lot about health and science here. It is one of my favorite topics. I love science. I always have. I also love sharing tips for healthier living and helping to inform people what is going on out there, in reference to information about the benefits of various foods and medications, and what to avoid.

However, I TRY to always remind you that I am not a Doctor. Do not say anything I say as absolute fact. If you are feeling something is off, or you are sick, GO SEE A DOCTOR. Do not diagnose yourself. Do not start doing some sort of treatment, because you THINK you may have this or that.

You know, true story, I went to the Doctor just last month. I had Bronchitis. I knew I had Bronchitis. I get Bronchitis nearly twice a year. I contribute 30 some years of smoking to this phenomena. So I get it so often, I know what it is. If it walks like a Duck, Quacks like a Duck, it's a Duck. Right? So I go in and tell the Doctor "I got Bronchitis." The Doctor looked at me and said, "Let me do the diagnosis. Just tell me what is going on." So tests, more tests, and then Doctor says, "You have Bronchitis." Great. Now that we got that cleared up, can I have the meds.

However, the Doctor was right to make the statement "Let me do the diagnosis." Bronchitis is pretty simple. For me anyway. But lets say it was something else. I go and start taking meds, THINKING I have something, turns out, I didn't. Turns out I had something completely different. Now I treating myself for A, which is not doing anything for B, and could actually make B worse.

This is great advice by Health Day / Yahoo Health - What's That Symptom? Experts Warn of Self-Diagnosis Via the Web

FRIDAY, July 27 (HealthDay News) -- Got a weird ache or pain? A rash that's hung around too long? With the wealth of information now available at the click of a mouse, it's common to search the Web to figure out what may be wrong with you.

But a new study suggests that when the symptoms are your own, "self-diagnosis" via the Internet -- or anywhere but a doctor's office -- too often leads to inaccurate, worst-case conclusions.

Research suggests that people tend to overestimate their own risk for serious ailments, in a way that they wouldn't do if they were thinking about someone else's symptoms.

"This is particularly true when the disease is rare," said study co-author Dengfeng Yan, a doctoral student at the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.

"That is, given the same set of symptoms, people will overestimate their own likelihood of getting such rare (often serious) diseases than that of other people."

The study was published online recently in the Journal of Consumer Research and will appear in the journal's February 2013 print issue.

Now of course there really are people that suffer Hypochondria. But this is not what they are referring to. Anyone. Anyone that is feeling something is wrong. If you go to the Internet and read symptoms are: fever, fatigue, sore throat. You say to yourself I have Infectious Mononucleosis. Do you? Maybe just the Flu. Strep? Could actually be anything. The article goes on.

In a series of six experiments, Yan and co-researcher Jaideep Sengupta gave nearly 250 college students information about such diseases as flu, HIV, osteoporosis and breast cancer.

In the experiment on flu, for example, the students were told they were simply being tested on what they knew about the illness. But the researchers then told them to imagine that they had a number of symptoms -- cough, fever, runny nose, headache -- and then asked whether they thought they had "regular" flu or the (at the time) rarer and scarier H1N1 "swine" flu. They were also asked to diagnose a hypothetical "someone else" with these symptoms.

According to the researchers, when referring to their own symptoms people were much quicker to diagnose the rarer H1N1 strain of flu compared to if they thought the symptoms were someone else's. In other words, their accuracy in correctly gauging the likelihood of H1N1 infection dropped if they were thinking about their own symptoms.

Why the difference? "We explain these effects using the concept of psychological distance," Yan said. With distancing -- in other words, thinking about someone else rather than yourself -- people tend to rely more on broader information such as statistics (that is, the likelihood any one person will get disease X) and less on information specific to the individual, such as the symptoms he or she is having.

"Consumers often fear the worst when it comes to their own health, while maintaining a calm objectivity with regard to others," Yan said. If you've got pain in the chest, you think: heart attack. If a friend of a friend has the same symptoms, you say: probably indigestion.

Or Heartburn. Something else I know a lot about. But this is typical human nature. We, for the most part, all, of us think of ourselves as the center of the Universe. I'm not talking about arrogance. It just is the way we are. We live in our bodies. In our own little worlds. In our Bubbles. We walk around and look at all these things that are around us, as if they are there for us. We look at others as those that benefit us, or not. Even just for friendships. We let in to our little worlds, very few. We love them, as we love ourselves.

When we see bad things happen, we always think, that could never happen to me. When we see that there is a possibility of us actually having something wrong with us, we fear the worse. Human nature.

But this type of thinking can have downsides, the authors write, often leading "to mistakenly diagnosing oneself as possessing a serious disease, causing both unnecessary anxiety and wasteful medical expenditure." They add that, "mistaken self-diagnoses of this sort are particularly likely given the ease of information access on the Internet, which frequently leads consumers to engage in 'symptom-matching' exercises."

The findings ring true with Dr. Peter Galier, an internal medicine specialist at Santa Monica-UCLA Medical Center, who reviewed the findings.

"I think it's human nature," he said. People are much more likely to worry about themselves and family members, he said, than about strangers.

Getting information via the Web can also make it difficult to decide what symptoms mean in the absence of a doctor's analysis. "When people are able to access a lot of information that isn't filtered, and they don't have expertise in the field, they don't know how to prioritize the information," Galier explained.

That's true whether you're investigating that strange knocking noise in your car but have no clue about mechanics, he said, or whether you've just spotted a lump in your thigh and have no medical expertise.

For instance, a healthy young man may have just drank a very cold soda and then has crushing chest pain. If he looks that up online, he is likely to see that the symptoms may point to a heart attack, Galier said. But that information doesn't take vital facts such as the man's age and medical history into account, he said. "Chest pain in a 55-year-old guy is looked at much differently than in a 25-year-old guy," he said.

Instead of doing amateur diagnosing on their own, Yan said, "We advise people to see a real doctor."

And as the new study points out, ''The advantage of seeing a real doctor isn't just because he or she is an expert," he said. "It's also that they aren't you."

For that reason, they will take into account less "emotional" information, such as how many people in the population actually get the condition you worry that you might have.

And what about that worrying time before you can get to your doctor's office? "People may simply tell the situation to their colleagues," Yan said, since they're likely to put those symptoms into a less panicked perspective.

So the bottom line is simple folks. If you do not feel well, or you feel something is not quite right, go see a Doctor. It's OK to research information on possible sickness and Disease, but the Doctor can tell you if you actually have it. Once you are diagnosed, your Doctor may even tell you where to find useful information about what the DOCTOR says you have, Online. But take MY Doctor's advice. "Let me {The Doctor} do the diagnosis. Just tell me what is going on."

Peter
Sources:
Health Day / Yahoo Health - What's That Symptom? Experts Warn of Self-Diagnosis Via the Web

Some In The UK Say No Way

Obama did it here. Some in the UK say no way.

Hey folks,

We have been talking about this for years. One such example is this. OPNTalk - Government To Take Control Of the Internet? I told you this is one of the ways a government starts down the road to socialism. On Sunday, January 18, 2009, I posted this: OPNTalk - Supreme Leader Obama 


Now I just re-posted two of the original posts that deal directly with what is happening right here in front of all of us to see. Now it seems that there are some in the UK that are starting to see a threat as well. Seems that the UK is talking about monitoring the Internet. According to The UK Guardian - Tim Berners-Lee urges government to stop the snooping bill by Ian Katz guardian.co.uk, Tuesday 17 April 2012 16.34 EDT
Exclusive: Extension of surveillance powers 'a destruction of human rights'

The government's controversial plans to allow intelligence agencies to monitor the internet use and digital communications of every person in the UK suffered a fresh blow on Tuesday when the inventor of the world wide web warned that the measures were dangerous and should be dropped.

Sir Tim Berners-Lee, who serves as an adviser to the government on how to make public data more accessible, says the extension of the state's surveillance powers would be a "destruction of human rights" and would make a huge amount of highly intimate information vulnerable to theft or release by corrupt officials. In an interview with the Guardian, Berners-Lee said: "The amount of control you have over somebody if you can monitor internet activity is amazing.

"You get to know every detail, you get to know, in a way, more intimate details about their life than any person that they talk to because often people will confide in the internet as they find their way through medical websites … or as an adolescent finds their way through a website about homosexuality, wondering what they are and whether they should talk to people about it."

Obama already did this here. We have Obamanet. Our Government CAN monitor the Net and even have the power to shut down any site it deems a threat to national security. Yup. Anything Obama and crew decide is a threat, they can shut down. It really is a great Article.

So we just sit back and allow the Government to takeover the Internet. Think about what Sir Tim Berners-Lee said here. The Government can, and are now as we speak, monitor every person that goes Online. They can see where you go Online. What you search for. You really think Google just decided to store all your traffic info for themselves?

Folks, take a few minutes to check out the two re-posts I just posted here. Socialism can and IS happening here as we speak. It reminds me of a conversation,,,,make that a conversation I was TRYING to have with two friends on Friday. I could not get a word in. All they did was laugh at anything they THOUGHT I was about to say, and blame Bush for EVERYTHING. Yup. EVERYTHING. One of my friends actually said Obama is great for this country and will win in a landslide. Housing? Unemployment? Debt? Energy? They both just kept laughing and saying how everything is Bush's fault. I finally had enough and told them, hey, you don't want to be educated with the truth and facts, there is nothing I can do to help you. Then I got in my car and drove away, leaving the two laughing Idiots in the parking lot.

That is the sad thing here folks. These two are not alone. There are a lot of them out there. So completely blind to what is happening right in front of their faces. Completely ignorant to Reality. COMPLETELY! The scariest part? These people vote. This is why we need to continue to educate as many people as we can. Why? As the old saying goes, those that are ignorant of History are doomed to repeat it. Those that do not learn by watching all the failures anytime Socialism is tried anyway in the World, are doom to think it might actually work here.
Peter